Blog
general
6 min read

The Day the Judiciary Was Put on Trial: The Fracture the Law Distortion Crime's National Assembly Passage Left in Korea's 80-Year Judicial History

On February 26, 2026, the 'Law Distortion Crime' — carrying up to 10 years in prison for judges and prosecutors who intentionally distort the law — passed the National Assembly plenum under the leadership of the Democratic Party of Korea. Amid fierce opposition from the Supreme Court and the opposition party, the first of the three judicial reform bills cleared its initial hurdle, with constitutional review proceedings and a clash with the Constitutional Court signaling a second round of conflict.

대한민국 국회의사당 건물 서울 여의도
대한민국 국회의사당 건물 서울 여의도

Why this law matters: For the first time in 80 years of judicial history, a provision enabling the criminal prosecution of judges and prosecutors for 'distorting the law' has been enshrined in the Criminal Act.

TL;DR

  • On the afternoon of February 26, 2026, the Law Distortion Crime (newly inserted Article 123-2 of the Criminal Act) passed the National Assembly plenum, led by the Democratic Party of Korea
  • 170 members present; 163 in favor, 3 against, 4 abstentions — the People Power Party boycotted en masse
  • Key provision: judges, prosecutors, and investigators who intentionally distort the law in criminal cases face up to 10 years in prison
  • The Supreme Court immediately convened an emergency national court chiefs meeting in protest, announcing plans for a constitutional review
  • The first of the three judicial reform bills to pass — the Petition for Constitutional Court Review Act (revision to the Constitutional Court Act) and the Supreme Court Justice Expansion Act are next in line

What Happened — The Facts

Core Content of the Bill

The criminal law amendment passed by the National Assembly today newly inserts Article 123-2, stipulating the following:

If a judge, prosecutor, or investigator influences the outcome of a trial or investigation in a criminal case by intentionally failing to comply with the requirements for applying statutes → imprisonment of up to 10 years

A provision that originally sought to include civil and administrative cases was revised amid unconstitutionality concerns and is now limited to criminal cases. The bill also includes an expansion of the scope of espionage charges from the existing 'enemy state' to 'a foreign country or an organization equivalent thereto.'

The Vote

ItemDetails
Date of VoteAfternoon of February 26, 2026
Members Present170
In Favor163
Against3 (including Democratic Party Rep. Kwak Sang-eon)
Abstentions4 (including Reps. Kim Yong-min and Chu Mi-ae, who were absent)
People Power PartyFull boycott

The People Power Party refused to enter the plenary chamber, condemning the bill as a "judicial terror to save President Lee Jae-myung" and "mutilating 80 years of judicial framework."


Why It Went Viral — The Spread Mechanism

'Judicial Reform' vs. 'Judicial Destruction'

The Law Distortion Crime has become not just a legal revision but a political battleground.

  • Democratic Party's logic: The practice of prosecutors and courts weaponizing the law for political purposes must end. It is an unavoidable measure to restore public trust in the judiciary.
  • People Power Party's logic: This is 'bulletproof legislation' designed to neutralize trials related to President Lee Jae-myung. Judges and prosecutors will no longer be able to investigate according to their convictions.
  • Legal community's reaction: The Court Administration Office, the Prosecutor General, and dozens of chief judges expressed opposition. Chief Justice Cho Hee-dae publicly criticized the bill, calling it a "violation of the constitutional spirit."

Factors Behind the Real-Time Search Surge

  1. Breaking news effect: Major media broke the story simultaneously right after the afternoon vote → real-time search rankings spiked
  2. Yesterday's preview vs. today's reality: The February 25 convening of the Supreme Court's national court chiefs meeting was the trailer; today's actual passage was the main feature
  3. Dissenting vote within the Democratic Party: Rep. Kwak Sang-eon voted against → drew additional attention as a 'crack within the ruling party'
  4. Next bills announced: Sequential issue chain triggered by the previewing of the Petition for Constitutional Court Review and Supreme Court Justice Expansion Act

Context and Background — Why Now?

The Structure of the Three Judicial Reform Bills

The judicial reform package of three bills pursued by the Democratic Party:

  1. Law Distortion Crime (Criminal Act revision) → ✅ Passed February 26
  2. Petition for Constitutional Court Review (Constitutional Court Act revision) → Vote scheduled for February 27
  3. Expansion of Supreme Court Justices (Court Organization Act revision) → Target passage February 28

If all three bills pass, the judicial structure will change fundamentally. In particular, the Petition for Constitutional Court Review would allow final rulings of the Supreme Court to be brought before the Constitutional Court again, sparking controversy over whether this would effectively create a 'four-tier judicial system.'

Comparison with Germany's Law Distortion Crime

The Law Distortion Crime has its origin in Germany's Criminal Code (Section 339). In Germany, judges or public officials who distort the law to reach a favorable or unfavorable decision are subject to punishment. However, even in Germany, actual prosecutions are extremely rare, and concerns over the unconstitutionality of the vague standard for 'distortion of the law' were raised in Korea from the outset.


Outlook — What Happens Next?

Short Term (1–2 Weeks)

  • Forced passage of the Petition for Constitutional Court Review and Supreme Court Justice Expansion Act expected
  • People Power Party expected to file a competence dispute claim and constitutional petition with the Constitutional Court
  • Possibility of an official Supreme Court statement or collective action

Medium Term (3–6 Months)

  • Constitutional Court review: Whether the Law Distortion Crime is unconstitutional is expected to be the central battleground
  • If an actual application case arises, social repercussions will reignite
  • Whether a chilling effect on prosecutorial investigations and judicial proceedings materializes empirically

Long Term

  • Restructuring of the separation of powers: A precedent in which the legislature strengthens its control over the judiciary
  • If the Constitutional Court rules it unconstitutional → legislation nullified, political blow to the Democratic Party
  • If ruled constitutional → judicial chilling effect becomes reality, changes in investigative and judicial practice

Checklist: Key Points to Watch Going Forward

Vote on Petition for Constitutional Court Review (Constitutional Court Act revision) — expected February 27
Supreme Court Justice Expansion Act — target February 28
Whether People Power Party files a competence dispute claim and injunction with the Constitutional Court
Chief Justice Cho Hee-dae's official follow-up response
First actual case applying the Law Distortion Crime


Image Source

Related Posts